Evidence index · Sauté Pans
Only claims about sauté pans made by people we have grounds to call Gear Review YouTube. The unrestricted sauté pans evidence is on the sauté pans page.
Gear Review YouTube is a community we read.
3 people on record as Gear Review YouTube make 19 quoted claims about sauté pans across 2 sources. Membership is recorded with its own evidence — for a person by the trait they are on record holding, for a community by the source it was said in — and authority is scoped to sauté pans rather than to fame.
Endorsements and objections about sauté pans from Gear Review YouTube, together, strongest evidence first.
This is the Made In Stainless Clad Saute Pan. It had all the right dimensions, it rocked the cooking test, and it's $149, which was less than half of the most expensive pan in the lineup.
Two judgements rest on this sentence:
So there you have it. The winning sautoir is the Made In Stainless Clad Saute Pan at about $150.
it's bigger i don't know to me this is a clear winner i would save my money and i would not buy the old clad i hate to say it but that's what i believe
some of the people actually said that this warped while they were cooking on an induction top or a ceramic top and that would definitely be a deal breaker because if it warps you can't it won't cook induction works by contact
Cites induction compatible (against), warp resistance (against)
here is one of the differences in the specs so all clad you can put under a broiler and you can bring it up to a temperature safely up to 600 degrees won't warp it's designed for that now costco on the other hand these are only suggested to be brought up to a temperature of 380 degrees and they're really not designed…
Cites ease of cleaning (against), heating speed (against), heat resistance (against)
the center of the old clay pan is 171 and the center of the costco pan is at 143. so the all plaid pan comes up to temperature faster than the costco pan
so at 5 minutes and 15 seconds this is pretty much boiling that is starting to boil the all-clad pan comes up to temperature faster
so i did manage to get them clean it took at least 15 minutes to clean each one it was really uncomfortable boiling them with the bar keepers friend really made the difference
Not a recommendation for a specific product: technique, materials and what to look for in sauté pans. Citable on its own terms.
The helper handle really helps stabilize the pan when it's ripping hot and it's coming out of the oven full of food. So you want that.
In terms of the primary handle, they preferred them longer and straighter, like this one or that one.
And testers really preferred the lighter end, the ones closer to 3 pounds.
And those two characteristics make it great for shallow frying, for braising, and we like to cook down fresh greens in these things also.
Cites shape and form
We like saute pans because they combine a couple of really useful characteristics.
Cites shape and form
Made it a little less comfortable to get in there with utensils. This one, however, it had 2-inch sidewalls and some of the spinach jumped ship when it was being stirred around in this one. So the sweet spot for the sidewalls was right in between the two, something like this at about 2 1/2 inches.
Cites shape and form (against)
One is it's got a pretty broad cooking surface, like that skillet does. Second, it's got medium, high straight sides.
Cites even heating, shape and form, size and capacity
All of these pins did well in our cooking tests, and those included making Swedish meatballs, baking Mexican rice, and sauteing a pound of fresh spinach.
One of the characteristics that made a difference to testers was the cooking surface.
Computed only from claims about sauté pans by people we have grounds to call Gear Review YouTube, so the axes answer “according to Gear Review YouTube” rather than “according to everyone”.
Domain authority
1 recommender, weighted by demonstrated expertise in sauté pans. Weighted by expertise in this category, never by audience size.
Independent consensus
1 independent voice across 1 source. How many independent voices converge, unweighted.
Long-term ownership
no dated ownership reports yet. Volume and length of dated first-hand ownership reports.
Performance
5 performance claims. Claims about how well it does the job.
Value
1 claim about price relative to what it does. Claims about what it costs relative to what it does.
Repairability
no repairability claims yet. Claims about whether it can be maintained or rebuilt.
Community breadth
all evidence from a single community so far. How many distinct communities converge, rather than one echo chamber.
Recency of evidence
most recent evidence from 2016. How recent the evidence is. Old evidence is not wrong, just older.
Objections raised
2 negative claims, mostly performance and ergonomics. How much complaint is on the record. A high figure means the drawbacks have been stated and quoted, not that the thing is worse.
These are separate measurements, not components of a score. They are never added together, and there is no overall rating, because which of them matters depends on what you are buying the thing for. An axis that says no evidence means nobody has spoken about it, not that the answer is low.