Reached For

Evidence index · Graters

Graters, according to chefs

Only claims about graters made by people we have grounds to call chefs. The unrestricted graters evidence is on the graters page.

chefs is an occupation.

5 people on record as chefs make 18 quoted claims about graters across 7 sources. Membership is recorded with its own evidence — for a person by the trait they are on record holding, for a community by the source it was said in — and authority is scoped to graters rather than to fame.

Which graters do chefs recommend?

Endorsements and objections about graters from chefs, together, strongest evidence first.

Microplane grater

1:30 supports Joshua Weissman Chef
now lots of people have a grater but the one that i would really recommend is a microplane which is really the best grater on the planet if you want those nice delicate threads

Two judgements rest on this sentence:

19 Tools To Make Cooking Easier

What do chefs say about graters in general?

Not a recommendation for a specific product: technique, materials and what to look for in graters. Citable on its own terms.

15:04 supports Joshua Weissman speaking on Joshua Weissman Recipes Chef
The microplane makes beautiful shavings. It's perfect for Parmigiano Reggiano or when you're grating cheese on top of something, but it's also great for grating huge spices like nutmeg.

use-case fit Cooking Tools Everyone Needs

Cites versatility

How do graters score among chefs?

Computed only from claims about graters by people we have grounds to call chefs, so the axes answer “according to chefs” rather than “according to everyone”.

Domain authority

1 recommender, weighted by demonstrated expertise in graters. Weighted by expertise in this category, never by audience size.

Independent consensus

1 independent voice across 2 sources. How many independent voices converge, unweighted.

Long-term ownership

1 dated ownership report, median 2 months. Volume and length of dated first-hand ownership reports.

Performance

7 performance claims. Claims about how well it does the job.

Value

1 claim about price relative to what it does. Claims about what it costs relative to what it does.

Repairability

no repairability claims yet. Claims about whether it can be maintained or rebuilt.

Community breadth

all evidence from a single community so far. How many distinct communities converge, rather than one echo chamber.

Recency of evidence

most recent evidence from 2023. How recent the evidence is. Old evidence is not wrong, just older.

Objections raised

4 negative claims, mostly performance and durability. How much complaint is on the record. A high figure means the drawbacks have been stated and quoted, not that the thing is worse.

These are separate measurements, not components of a score. They are never added together, and there is no overall rating, because which of them matters depends on what you are buying the thing for. An axis that says no evidence means nobody has spoken about it, not that the answer is low.